The Battered Voter Syndrome

Obamney for Insanity 2012

He lies to me all the time.  He takes my money and tells me that I can’t spend it as well as he can.  I’ve watched him spend us into financial ruin, giving money to his friends, wasting money on irresponsible schemes.  We’re so far in debt, we’ll never get out.

I work long hours to support him.  I bring home all the money, yet he tells me what to do all day long.  He winds up controlling almost every aspect of my life.  He even tells me that I don’t know how to properly raise my own children.

It’s probably all my fault.  I just need to show him that I support him 100 percent.  Maybe then he’ll treat me better.

The above passage is paraphrased from Wayne Allyn Root’s book, The Conscience of a Libertarian.  Both Republicans and Democrats are suffering from battered voter syndrome.  How many times can we be lied to without changing our habits?  Without realizing that voting for “the lesser of two evils” is still a vote for evil?

Conservatives are responsible for the election of Barack Obama, regardless of their internal ideology or justification for their behavior.  And in this case, “behavior” refers to “voting habits”.  A vote for George W. Bush ultimately led to the election of Barack Obama.  We believed Bush was a fiscal conservative and wouldn’t go over budget, just as we believed his father and Ronald Reagan would stay within the budget.

And then he dramatically increased spending for the Department of Education.  No Child Left Behind, remember that whopper?  Some estimates put the price tag of NCLB at $25 billion per year.  That’s $25 billion of OUR money going down the drain into “education”.  More like into teacher’s unions and more bureaucratic administrators.  The government is spending roughly $77 billion on education, nearly seven times more than the allotted budget in 1980.

Are students in this country seven times smarter than they were in 1980?  Absolutely not.  The ACT national composite test score was 20.6 in 1990.  Compare that to 21.0 in 2010.  Apparently, throwing money at the solution doesn’t work, but both Democrats and Republicans will swear up and down that education needs more funding.  What it actually needs is a completely different approach, but that’s a different topic for a different time.

Let’s not forget George H.W. Bush’s “Read my lips, no new taxes.”  And then he promptly raised taxes to expand government.  He lied to us, saying he was a tax cutter who stood for limited government while slapping his conservative Republican voting base in the face.

And don’t even get me started on the liberal spending spree.  Barack Obama’s $787 billion “stimulus” package has hardly stimulated anything.  Then again, he didn’t campaign on slowing spending, did he?  He promised “reform” and “change”, but he’s just hiring more federal government bureaucrats who ascend to the upper echelons of society through bloated pensions and guaranteed yearly raises, all the while raising taxes on the little guys to ensure his buddies are given quality treatment.

He spoke of transparency, like airing the national health care debate on C-SPAN so the public could be a part of it.  Instead, he engaged in backdoor deals and a successful attempt to pass it in the middle of the night.  He spoke of ending corruption and lobbyists in Washington, D.C., but his commerce secretary Bill Richardson stepped down over a criminal investigation, his health secretary candidate Tom Daschle owed over $140,000 in back taxes and stepped down, and his Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner “forgot” to pay $35,000 in taxes (not to mention he had a hand in bailing out AIG).

Corruption certainly doesn’t help out the little guys.  Voters are consistently saying that the U.S. is not headed in the right direction.

Republicans are getting screwed by their candidates, and I guarantee Mitt Romney will be no different.  Democrats are getting screwed by their candidates, whether they admit it or not.

Why are we voting for the “lesser of two evils”?  Why are we merely accepting what the political establishment has commanded?

This election year, I’m voting on principle, not politics, and I’ll continue to do so from here on out.  It’s the right thing to do.  Join me.


9 thoughts on “The Battered Voter Syndrome

  1. Most Libertarians I know always knuckle under and vote Republican in the end.
    By the way, that’s not the definition of insanity. It’s from a quote by Einstein, who said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” He was talking about using new mathematical ideas to look at the universe.

    • Then most libertarians you know aren’t libertarians! Just as most Republicans aren’t fiscal conservatives.

      So that’s point one. Your second point is a knock against the image I used? Come back if you have something substantial to say… I’ll be here.

      • I apologize. It wasn’t intended as a knock, just a “did you know” kinda thing. I really wasn’t trying to be contrary. I completely agree with your position. A lot of people that call themselves whatever label don’t follow, agree with, or even understand, what that label stands for.
        We couldn’t be in more agreement!

      • No worries at all! I do agree with your “label” comment — our society is one of labels and it’s difficult to be anything but a label. And when you try to shed those labels, you find yourself between a rock and a hard place.

  2. Well said! I feel equally betrayed as a Libertarian minded type. Its aggravating that Democrats are blind to true education reform, and Republicans refuse to stop intervening overseas; and that none of them will stop subsidizing businesses and farms, and bailing out failed companies. Seems like the government didn’t have any problems to solve until they started “solving problems”.

    • “Seems like the government didn’t have any problems to solve until they started ‘solving problems’.”

      I think that perfectly sums up the entire debacle! Government certainly isn’t the solution, and is most definitely the problem. Only government could have the audacity to come in, make a mess, and try to convince us that they’re the only ones who can clean it up. Even worse, the voters believe them!

  3. “Why are we voting for the “lesser of two evils”? ” Clearly, there is no other choice – but Obama is a radical, transforming America into a socialist nirvana, of dictatorial control. NO doubt Romney will be much better – then the job continues to get some Conservatives in Congress. The choice of a Marxist Obama or a moderate Romney.

  4. Pingback: paradigm - The Forums

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s